Talk:Sources.xml/Types - Revision history

Karellen at 07:18, 20 July 2020

2020-07-20T07:18:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, 20 July 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:


	:Step one would be to make sure that what's currently listed still applies to XBMC v11. Just about everything should, I think. Then add the new protocols that might be missing, like [[AFP]], [[NFS]], etc. Then just general spell checking, making things sound clear and easy to understand, stuff like that. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 13:27, 29 March 2012 (EDT)		:Step one would be to make sure that what's currently listed still applies to XBMC v11. Just about everything should, I think. Then add the new protocols that might be missing, like AFP, NFS, etc. Then just general spell checking, making things sound clear and easy to understand, stuff like that. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 13:27, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

	Next question, do we have to coordinate the content of this page (which does not appear in the menu of the Online Manual), with the pages like http://wiki.xbmc.org/index.php?title=SMB (which are on the menu)? This last page describes how to set-up a SMB share, and not how to use it with XBMC. I would suggest to add the "media source type" page somewhere in the menu, describing all supported protocols, and one page by protocol describing how to configure it in XBMC and how to provide the service with home made servers (or other ways).		Next question, do we have to coordinate the content of this page (which does not appear in the menu of the Online Manual), with the pages like http://wiki.xbmc.org/index.php?title=SMB (which are on the menu)? This last page describes how to set-up a SMB share, and not how to use it with XBMC. I would suggest to add the "media source type" page somewhere in the menu, describing all supported protocols, and one page by protocol describing how to configure it in XBMC and how to provide the service with home made servers (or other ways).
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[User:A rno\|A rno]] 14:33, 29 March 2012 (EDT)		[[User:A rno\|A rno]] 14:33, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

	:This specific page just describes what these source types look like in [[sources.xml]], and is a sub-page of that. Individual source pages, like [[SMB]], [[NFS]], [[AFP]], should talk about how to both set them up on a computer and how to access them within XBMC. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 14:54, 29 March 2012 (EDT)		:This specific page just describes what these source types look like in sources.xml, and is a sub-page of that. Individual source pages, like SMB, NFS, AFP, should talk about how to both set them up on a computer and how to access them within XBMC. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 14:54, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

	== Picture sources ==		== Picture sources ==
Line 22:		Line 22:
	@ Ned Scott		@ Ned Scott

	[[Userdata/sources.xml/Source_types#Pictures_Specific_Sources]]		Userdata/sources.xml/Source_types#Pictures_Specific_Sources

	Is not a editor note and not right to mark it as such, because it is a question that needs a proper answer hence it was marked with {{?}} because it is incomplete imo. I will leave your editor note but note it is incomplete no matter what format the {{?}} takes.--uNiversal 07:02, 1 December 2012 (EST)		Is not a editor note and not right to mark it as such, because it is a question that needs a proper answer hence it was marked with {{?}} because it is incomplete imo. I will leave your editor note but note it is incomplete no matter what format the {{?}} takes.--uNiversal 07:02, 1 December 2012 (EST)
	:That's what {{tl\|editor note}} is for. It's for marking things that need fixing/expanding/whatever, or any other notes about what needs to be edited on the wiki. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 18:18, 1 December 2012 (EST)		:That's what {{tl\|editor note}} is for. It's for marking things that need fixing/expanding/whatever, or any other notes about what needs to be edited on the wiki. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 18:18, 1 December 2012 (EST)

Ned Scott: Ned Scott moved page Talk:Sources.xml/Source types to Talk:Sources.xml/Types

2014-01-25T17:56:34Z

Ned Scott moved page Talk:Sources.xml/Source types to Talk:Sources.xml/Types

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:56, 25 January 2014
(No difference)

Ned Scott: Ned Scott moved page Talk:Userdata/sources.xml/Source types to Talk:Sources.xml/Source types

2014-01-25T17:55:25Z

Ned Scott moved page Talk:Userdata/sources.xml/Source types to Talk:Sources.xml/Source types

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:55, 25 January 2014
(No difference)

Ned Scott: /* Picture sources */

2012-12-01T23:18:41Z

Picture sources

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 1 December 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Is not a editor note and not right to mark it as such, because it is a question that needs a proper answer hence it was marked with {{?}} because it is incomplete imo. I will leave your editor note but note it is incomplete no matter what format the {{?}} takes.--uNiversal 07:02, 1 December 2012 (EST)		Is not a editor note and not right to mark it as such, because it is a question that needs a proper answer hence it was marked with {{?}} because it is incomplete imo. I will leave your editor note but note it is incomplete no matter what format the {{?}} takes.--uNiversal 07:02, 1 December 2012 (EST)
			:That's what {{tl\|editor note}} is for. It's for marking things that need fixing/expanding/whatever, or any other notes about what needs to be edited on the wiki. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 18:18, 1 December 2012 (EST)

>UNiversal: /* Picture sources */ new section

2012-12-01T12:02:45Z

Picture sources: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 1 December 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:This specific page just describes what these source types look like in [[sources.xml]], and is a sub-page of that. Individual source pages, like [[SMB]], [[NFS]], [[AFP]], should talk about how to both set them up on a computer and how to access them within XBMC. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 14:54, 29 March 2012 (EDT)		:This specific page just describes what these source types look like in [[sources.xml]], and is a sub-page of that. Individual source pages, like [[SMB]], [[NFS]], [[AFP]], should talk about how to both set them up on a computer and how to access them within XBMC. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 14:54, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

			== Picture sources ==

			@ Ned Scott

			[[Userdata/sources.xml/Source_types#Pictures_Specific_Sources]]

			Is not a editor note and not right to mark it as such, because it is a question that needs a proper answer hence it was marked with {{?}} because it is incomplete imo. I will leave your editor note but note it is incomplete no matter what format the {{?}} takes.--uNiversal 07:02, 1 December 2012 (EST)

Ned Scott: /* What should be clean on this page? */

2012-03-29T18:54:40Z

What should be clean on this page?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:54, 29 March 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:

	[[User:A rno\|A rno]] 14:33, 29 March 2012 (EDT)		[[User:A rno\|A rno]] 14:33, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

			:This specific page just describes what these source types look like in [[sources.xml]], and is a sub-page of that. Individual source pages, like [[SMB]], [[NFS]], [[AFP]], should talk about how to both set them up on a computer and how to access them within XBMC. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 14:54, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

>A rno at 18:33, 29 March 2012

2012-03-29T18:33:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 29 March 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Next question, do we have to coordinate the content of this page (which does not appear in the menu of the Online Manual), with the pages like http://wiki.xbmc.org/index.php?title=SMB (which are on the menu)? This last page describes how to set-up a SMB share, and not how to use it with XBMC. I would suggest to add the "media source type" page somewhere in the menu, describing all supported protocols, and one page by protocol describing how to configure it in XBMC and how to provide the service with home made servers (or other ways).		Next question, do we have to coordinate the content of this page (which does not appear in the menu of the Online Manual), with the pages like http://wiki.xbmc.org/index.php?title=SMB (which are on the menu)? This last page describes how to set-up a SMB share, and not how to use it with XBMC. I would suggest to add the "media source type" page somewhere in the menu, describing all supported protocols, and one page by protocol describing how to configure it in XBMC and how to provide the service with home made servers (or other ways).

			[[User:A rno\|A rno]] 14:33, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

>A rno at 18:33, 29 March 2012

2012-03-29T18:33:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 29 March 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:

	:Step one would be to make sure that what's currently listed still applies to XBMC v11. Just about everything should, I think. Then add the new protocols that might be missing, like [[AFP]], [[NFS]], etc. Then just general spell checking, making things sound clear and easy to understand, stuff like that. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 13:27, 29 March 2012 (EDT)		:Step one would be to make sure that what's currently listed still applies to XBMC v11. Just about everything should, I think. Then add the new protocols that might be missing, like [[AFP]], [[NFS]], etc. Then just general spell checking, making things sound clear and easy to understand, stuff like that. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 13:27, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

			Next question, do we have to coordinate the content of this page (which does not appear in the menu of the Online Manual), with the pages like http://wiki.xbmc.org/index.php?title=SMB (which are on the menu)? This last page describes how to set-up a SMB share, and not how to use it with XBMC. I would suggest to add the "media source type" page somewhere in the menu, describing all supported protocols, and one page by protocol describing how to configure it in XBMC and how to provide the service with home made servers (or other ways).

Ned Scott at 17:27, 29 March 2012

2012-03-29T17:27:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 29 March 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	[[User:A rno\|A rno]] 06:51, 29 March 2012 (EDT)		[[User:A rno\|A rno]] 06:51, 29 March 2012 (EDT)


			:Step one would be to make sure that what's currently listed still applies to XBMC v11. Just about everything should, I think. Then add the new protocols that might be missing, like [[AFP]], [[NFS]], etc. Then just general spell checking, making things sound clear and easy to understand, stuff like that. -- [[User:Ned Scott\|Ned Scott]] 13:27, 29 March 2012 (EDT)

>A rno: /* What should be clean on this page? */ new section

2012-03-29T10:51:51Z

What should be clean on this page?: new section

← Older revision	Revision as of 10:51, 29 March 2012
Line 1:	Line 1:
		== What should be clean on this page? ==

		Hello.

		I read this page a lot of times and I'm now willing to keep it clean.

		Can anyone detail the improvements expected?

		[[User:A rno\|A rno]] 06:51, 29 March 2012 (EDT)